Understanding Treatment Response in Individual Profiles of Men with Prostatic Enlargement at Risk of Progression.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how cumulative multivariable effects of clinically relevant covariates impact response to pharmacological treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). OBJECTIVE: To develop models to predict treatment response in terms of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) or BPE-related surgery, based on large data sets and using as predictors baseline characteristics that commonly define the risk of disease progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9167 patients with LUTS/BPE at risk of progression in three placebo-controlled dutasteride trials and one comparing dutasteride, tamsulosin, and dutasteride + tamsulosin combination therapy (CT) were included in the analysis to predict response to placebo up to 24 mo and active treatment up to 48 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Predictors included age, IPSS, total prostate volume (PV), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), prostate-specific antigen, postvoid residual urine (PVR), α-blocker usage within 12 mo, and randomised treatment. A generalised least-squares model was developed for longitudinal IPSS and a Cox proportional-hazards model for time to first AUR/surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The vast majority of patients benefit from dutasteride or CT when compared with tamsulosin alone. The predicted IPSS improvement with dutasteride or CT increased with greater PV and severity of symptoms at baseline. The tamsulosin effect was lower with greater baseline PV and tended to decrease over time. Predicted AUR/surgery risk was greater with tamsulosin versus CT or dutasteride; this risk increased with larger PV, higher PVR, and lower Qmax (all at baseline). An educational interactive web-based tool facilitates visualisation of the results (www.bphtool.com). Limitations include: the placebo and active-treatment predictions are from different studies, the lack of similar studies for external validation, and the focus on a population at risk of progression from the 4-yr CombAT study. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive modelling based on large data sets and visualisation of the risk for individual profiles can improve our understanding of how risk factors for disease progression interact and affect response to different treatments, reinforcing the importance of an individualised approach for LUTS/BPE management. PATIENT SUMMARY: We used data from previous studies to develop statistical models for predicting how men with lower urinary tract symptoms or benign prostate enlargement and at risk of disease complications respond to certain treatments according to their individual characteristics.

Evaluation of a 3-item screening tool to identify men with benign prostatic enlargement/obstruction in a primary care cohort.

BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a progressive condition and common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), is underdiagnosed in primary care, impacting patient outcomes. Here, we evaluate the utility of a BPH screening tool in general practice, to identify men confirmed to have BPH after urologist assessment of diagnostic test results. METHODS: A 3-item questionnaire was developed to discriminate between LUTS due to BPH versus other conditions and was translated and validated cross-culturally. Its utility was assessed in a cohort study (FDC116114/NCT02757963) conducted in 47 centers across France, Germany, Italy, Russia, and Spain. The study enrolled men ≥50 years of age presenting to general practice clinics with a score of ≥3 on the BPH screening tool or ≥8 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). In total, 561 men completed the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a urologist-confirmed BPH diagnosis among those with a positive result on the BPH screening tool (score ≥3) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥2 ng/mL. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was fulfilled; 88.3% (95% CI: 84.9, 91.2) of patients had urologist-confirmed BPH diagnoses among those with positive results on the BPH screening tool and serum PSA≥2 ng/mL, similar to the proportion seen with IPSS≥8 and serum PSA≥2 ng/mL (87.7%; 95% CI: 84.6, 90.4). CONCLUSIONS: The BPH screening tool, in conjunction with serum PSA, demonstrated adequate predictive value by allowing general practitioners to quickly screen men presenting with different medical conditions but identified as having urological symptoms.

Model-based meta-analysis of the time to first acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery in patients with moderate or severe symptoms.

AIMS: Combination therapy of 5α-reductase inhibitor and α-blocker is a guideline-endorsed therapeutic approach for patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms or benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) who are at risk of disease progression. We aimed to disentangle the contribution of clinical and demographic baseline characteristics affecting the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery (AUR/S) from the effect of treatment with drugs showing symptomatic and disease-modifying properties. METHODS: A time-to-event model was developed using pooled data from patients (n = 10 238) enrolled into six clinical studies receiving placebo, tamsulosin, dutasteride or tamsulosin-dutasteride combination therapy. A parametric hazard function was used to describe the time to first AUR/S. Covariate model building included the assessment of relevant clinical and demographic factors on baseline hazard. Predictive performance was evaluated by graphical and statistical methods. RESULTS: An exponential hazard model best described the time to first AUR/S in this group of patients. Baseline International Prostate Symptom Score, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume and maximum urine flow were identified as covariates with hazard ratio estimates of 1.04, 1.08, 1.01 and 0.91, respectively. Dutasteride monotherapy and tamsulosin-dutasteride combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the baseline hazard (56.8% and 66.4%, respectively). By contrast, the effect of tamsulosin did not differ from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed the implications of disease-modifying properties of dutasteride and tamsulosin-dutasteride combination therapy for the risk of AUR/S. It also elucidated the contribution of different baseline characteristics to the risk of these events. The use of tamsulosin monotherapy (symptomatic treatment) has no impact on individual long-term risk.

Impact of early vs. delayed initiation of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery in LUTS/BPH patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms at risk of disease progression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of delayed start of combination therapy (CT) with dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg on the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery (AUR/S) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at risk of disease progression. METHODS: Using a time-to-event model based on pooled data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials, clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed to assess the risk of AUR/S up to 48 months in moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH patients following immediate and delayed start of CT for those not responding to tamsulosin monotherapy. Simulation scenarios (1300 subjects/arm) were investigated, including immediate start (reference) and alternative delayed start (six scenarios 1-24 months). AUR/S incidence was described by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and analysed using log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events as well as the relative and attributable risks were summarised stratified by treatment. RESULTS: Survival curves for patients starting CT at month 1 and 3 did not differ from those who initiated CT immediately. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed when switch to CT occurs ≥ 6 months from the initial treatment. At month 48, AUR/S incidence was 4.6% vs 9.5%, 11.0% and 11.3% in patients receiving immediate CT vs. switchers after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Start of CT before month 6 appears to significantly reduce the risk of AUR/S compared with delayed start by ≥ 6 months. This has implications for the treatment algorithm for men with LUTS/BPH at risk of disease progression.

Model-based meta-analysis of individual International Prostate Symptom Score trajectories in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with moderate or severe symptoms.

AIMS: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a marker of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) deterioration or improvement in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Whereas changes in IPSS relative to baseline have been used as endpoints in clinical trials, little attention has been given to the time course of symptoms. The current investigation aimed to develop a drug-disease model to describe individual IPSS trajectories in moderate and severe BPH patients. METHODS: A model-based meta-analytical approach was used including data from 10 238 patients enrolled into Phase III and IV studies receiving placebo, tamsulosin, dutasteride or combination therapy over a period of up to 4 years. Model predictive performance was assessed using statistical and graphical criteria. Subsequently, simulations were performed to illustrate the implications of treatment with drugs showing symptomatic and disease-modifying properties in patients with varying disease progression rates. RESULTS: Improvement and worsening of IPSS could be characterized by a model including a sigmoid function which disentangles drug effects from placebo and varying disease progression rates on IPSS. Mean estimate (95% confidence intervals) for the disease progression rate was 0.319 (0.271-0.411) month-1 . Treatment effect on IPSS (DELTA) was found to be 0.0605, 0.0139 and 0.0310 month-1 for placebo, tamsulosin and combination therapy, respectively. In addition, it appears that individual trajectories can be clustered together into different phenotypes describing the underlying disease progression rate (i.e. slow, moderate and fast progressors). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a drug-disease model enables the evaluation of interindividual differences in disease progression rate, deterioration of symptoms and treatment effects on LUTS/BPH.

Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire score changes vs spontaneous sexual adverse event reporting in men treated with dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled study.

AIM: To assess the impact of baseline characteristics on Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) total scores and to evaluate the clinical relevance of MSHQ changes and their association with spontaneously reported sexual adverse events (SexAEs) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the Phase 4 FDC116115 study, in which patients aged ≥50 years were randomised 1:1 to receive a fixed-dose combination of dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg (DUT-TAM FDC), or placebo. End-points included: change in MSHQ total scores by baseline characteristics and SexAEs; cumulative distribution function for change from baseline to month 12 in MSHQ total score and the ejaculation, erection, satisfaction and sexual desire (libido) domain scores; and relationship between changes in MSHQ scores and SexAEs. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 489 patients (DUT-TAM FDC, n = 243; placebo, n = 246). The mean reduction in total MSHQ score was greater in patients with SexAEs across both groups, compared with patients without SexAEs. Most patients reporting any SexAE (86% DUT-TAM FDC, 67% placebo) had a worsening of the MSHQ total score at month 12 compared with baseline. Specifically, 90% (DUT-TAM FDC) and 75% (placebo) of patients reporting an ejaculation SexAE and 73% (DUT-TAM FDC) and 87% (placebo) of patients reporting an erection SexAE had a worsening of MSHQ ejaculation and erection domain scores, respectively, at month 12. A threshold effect for incident SexAE was observed; patients showing a decrease of approximately 6-10 points in the total MSHQ score were more likely to report SexAEs. CONCLUSION: Findings support the clinical utility of the MSHQ tool in assessing the impact of DUT-TAM on sexual function by linking numerical changes in MSHQ scores to spontaneously reported SexAEs for the first time. The threshold effect for incidence of SexAEs warrants further investigation to determine its clinical relevance.

Impact of disease progression on individual IPSS trajectories and consequences of immediate versus delayed start of treatment in patients with moderate or severe LUTS associated with BPH.

PURPOSE: Despite superiority of tamsulosin-dutasteride combination therapy versus monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), patients at risk of disease progression are often initiated on α-blockers. This study evaluated the impact of initiating tamsulosin monotherapy prior to switching to tamsulosin-dutasteride combination therapy versus immediate combination therapy using a longitudinal model describing International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) trajectories in moderate/severe LUTS/BPH patients at risk of disease progression. METHODS: Clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed using data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials. The effect of varying disease progression rates was explored by comparing profiles on- and off-treatment. CTS scenarios were investigated, including a reference (immediate combination therapy) and six alternative virtual treatment arms (delayed combination therapy of 1-24 months). Clinical response (≥ 25% IPSS reduction relative to baseline) was analysed using log-rank test. Differences in IPSS relative to baseline at various on-treatment time points were assessed by t tests. RESULTS: Delayed combination therapy initiation led to significant (p < 0.01) decreases in clinical response. At month 48, clinical response rate was 79.7% versus 74.1%, 70.3% and 71.0% and IPSS was 6.3 versus 7.6, 8.1 and 8.0 (switchers from tamsulosin monotherapy after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively) with immediate combination therapy. More patients transitioned from severe/moderate to mild severity scores by month 48. CONCLUSIONS: CTS allows systematic evaluation of immediate versus delayed combination therapy. Immediate response to α-blockers is not predictive of long-term symptom improvement. Observed IPSS differences between immediate and delayed combination therapy (6-24 months) are statistically significant.

Evaluation of the impact of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on libido in sexually active men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): A post hoc analysis of a prospective randomised placebo-controlled study.

AIMS: Five-α reductase inhibitor (5ARI) therapy has been associated with sexual dysfunction in some patients. This study assessed the impact of a fixed-dose combination of the 5ARI dutasteride 0.5 mg and the α1 -adrenoceptor antagonist tamsulosin 0.4 mg (DUT-TAM FDC) on Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) domain scores in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study in sexually active patients, aged ≥50 years, with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of BPH. Sexual activity, sexual desire, and bother domain scores of the MSHQ were assessed at baseline and at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Correlation between MSHQ sexual activity/desire scores and ejaculation, erection, and satisfaction domains at baseline was also evaluated. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population (N = 489), 243 and 246 patients were randomised to DUT-TAM FDC and placebo groups, respectively. Compared with placebo, DUT-TAM FDC therapy resulted in statistically significant reductions (worsening) from baseline in adjusted mean MSHQ sexual activity and bother domain scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 (all P < 0.05) and in adjusted mean MSHQ sexual desire domain scores at Months 6, 9, and 12 (all P < 0.05). Significant moderate correlations in the expected direction were observed at baseline between the sexual activity/desire domains and the ejaculation, erection, and satisfaction domains (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings help clarify the degree and impact of libido changes in sexually active men treated with DUT-TAM FDC and may support clinical decision-making.

Superiority of dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.2 mg for the treatment of moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia in Asian men.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg + tamsulosin 0.2 mg combination compared with tamsulosin 0.2 mg in Asian men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: A 4-week, single-blind, placebo, run-in was followed by a 2-year double-blind randomized controlled trial in men age ≥50 years with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, International Prostate Symptom Score ≥12, prostate volume ≥30 cc, prostate-specific antigen ≥1.5 and ≤10 ng/mL, peak urinary flow >5 and ≤15 mL/s, and voided volume of ≥125 mL. Participants were randomized to oral daily dutasteride 0.5 mg + tamsulosin 0.2 mg combination or tamsulosin 0.2 mg. The primary efficacy end-point was change in International Prostate Symptom Score at year 2. RESULTS: Data from 607 participants showed a significant reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (P < 0.05) at month 24, along with greater improvements (P ≤ 0.006) in peak urinary flow at every assessment and significant prostate volume reduction at months 12 and 24 (P < 0.001) in the combination group. Combination therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery (P = 0.012), primarily due to a significant reduction in the risk of acute urinary retention (P = 0.005). The safety and tolerability profile of combination therapy was consistent with the known profiles for the individual monotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: Dutasteride 0.5 mg + tamsulosin 0.2 mg combination therapy showed better clinical outcomes than tamsulosin 0.2 mg monotherapy, making it an effective and safe treatment option for Asian men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Relative Bioavailability of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Tamsulosin and Dutasteride: Results From 2 Randomized Trials in Healthy Male Volunteers.

The relative bioavailabilities of dutasteride/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.5 mg/0.2 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) capsules compared with coadministered reference products (1 dutasteride 0.5-mg capsule [Avodart® ] + 1 tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2-mg orally disintegrating tablet [Harnal D® ]) were investigated in 2 clinical trials under fasted and fed conditions (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02184585 and NCT02509104). Both trials were open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover studies in healthy male adults aged 18-65 years. Trial 1 evaluated 2 formulations (FDC1 and FDC2), and trial 2 evaluated a third formulation (FDC3). The primary end points were dutasteride area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to t (AUC(0-t) ) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) and tamsulosin AUC(0-∞) , AUC(0-t) , and Cmax . The formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios for each end point were within the range of 0.80-1.25. For FDC1 in trial 1, bioequivalence criteria were not met for dutasteride Cmax or AUC in the fasted state or for tamsulosin Cmax in the fasted or fed states. For FDC2 in trial 1, all bioequivalence criteria were met except for tamsulosin Cmax in the fasted state. For FDC3 in trial 2, bioequivalence criteria were met for all dutasteride and tamsulosin end points in both the fed and fasted states. Safety profiles were similar for all FDC formulations and combination treatments.

A prospective randomised placebo-controlled study of the impact of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on sexual function domains in sexually active men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the impact of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of the 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI), dutasteride 0.5 mg and the α1 -adrenoceptor antagonist, tamsulosin 0.4 mg (DUT-TAM FDC) therapy on sexual function domain scores in sexually active men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), using the Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This European and Australian double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted at 51 centres. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age ≥50 years, International Prostate Symptom Score ≥12, prostate volume ≥30 cc, prostate-specific antigen 1.5-10 ng/mL. Patients were randomised 1:1 to DUT-TAM FDC therapy or placebo for 12 months. The change from baseline to Month 12 on the total MSHQ (primary endpoint) and MSHQ erection, ejaculation and satisfaction domains (secondary outcome) was assessed, using a mixed model repeated measures analysis. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 489 patients (243 DUT-TAM FDC therapy; 246 placebo). A significant decrease (worsening) was observed with DUT-TAM FDC therapy versus placebo on the total MSHQ score (-8.7 vs -0.7; standard error [se]: 0.81, 0.78; P < 0.001), and the ejaculation (-7.5 vs -0.6; se: 0.56, 0.55; P < 0.001) and satisfaction (-0.6 vs +0.3; se: 0.3, 0.29, P = 0.047) domains, but not the erection domain (-1.0 vs -0.5; se: 0.19, 0.19, P = 0.091). CONCLUSION: This is the first domain-specific quantitative evaluation of DUT-TAM FDC therapy on sexual function in men with LUTS secondary to BPH. The observed changes in the MSHQ with DUT-TAM FDC therapy were mainly driven by changes in the ejaculation domain. These findings will help give context to erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction AEs reported spontaneously in earlier 5ARI studies.

Circulating and intraprostatic sex steroid hormonal profiles in relation to male pattern baldness and chest hair density among men diagnosed with localized prostate cancers.

BACKGROUND: Prospective cohort studies of circulating sex steroid hormones and prostate cancer risk have not provided a consistent association, despite evidence from animal and clinical studies. However, studies using male pattern baldness as a proxy of early-life or cumulative androgen exposure have reported significant associations with aggressive and fatal prostate cancer risk. Given that androgens underlie the development of patterned hair loss and chest hair, we assessed whether these two dermatological characteristics were associated with circulating and intraprostatic concentrations of sex steroid hormones among men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: We included 248 prostate cancer patients from the NCI Prostate Tissue Study, who answered surveys and provided a pre-treatment blood sample as well as fresh frozen adjacent normal prostate tissue. Male pattern baldness and chest hair density were assessed by trained nurses before surgery. General linear models estimated geometric means and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of each hormone variable by dermatological phenotype with adjustment for potential confounding variables. Subgroup analyses were performed by Gleason score (<7 vs ≥7) and race (European American vs. African American). RESULTS: We found strong positive associations of balding status with serum testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and a weak association with elevated intraprostatic testosterone. Conversely, neither circulating nor intraprostatic sex hormones were statistically significantly associated with chest hair density. Age-adjusted correlation between binary balding status and three-level chest hair density was weak (r = 0.05). There was little evidence to suggest that Gleason score or race modified these associations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that balding status assessed at a mean age of 60 years may serve as a clinical marker for circulating sex hormone concentrations. The weak-to-null associations between balding status and intraprostatic sex hormones reaffirm differences in organ-specific sex hormone metabolism, implying that other sex steroid hormone-related factors (eg, androgen receptor) play important roles in organ-specific androgenic actions, and that other overlapping pathways may be involved in associations between the two complex conditions.

Relationships between Circulating and Intraprostatic Sex Steroid Hormone Concentrations.

Background: Sex hormones have been implicated in prostate carcinogenesis, yet epidemiologic studies have not provided substantiating evidence. We tested the hypothesis that circulating concentrations of sex steroid hormones reflect intraprostatic concentrations using serum and adjacent microscopically verified benign prostate tissue from prostate cancer cases.Methods: Incident localized prostate cancer cases scheduled for surgery were invited to participate. Consented participants completed surveys, and provided resected tissues and blood. Histologic assessment of the ends of fresh frozen tissue confirmed adjacent microscopically verified benign pathology. Sex steroid hormones in sera and tissues were extracted, chromatographically separated, and then quantitated by radioimmunoassays. Linear regression was used to account for variations in intraprostatic hormone concentrations by age, body mass index, race, and study site, and subsequently to assess relationships with serum hormone concentrations. Gleason score (from adjacent tumor tissue), race, and age were assessed as potential effect modifiers.Results: Circulating sex steroid hormone concentrations had low-to-moderate correlations with, and explained small proportions of variations in, intraprostatic sex steroid hormone concentrations. Androstane-3α,17ß-diol glucuronide (3α-diol G) explained the highest variance of tissue concentrations of 3α-diol G (linear regression r2 = 0.21), followed by serum testosterone and tissue dihydrotestosterone (r2 = 0.10), and then serum estrone and tissue estrone (r2 = 0.09). There was no effect modification by Gleason score, race, or age.Conclusions: Circulating concentrations of sex steroid hormones are poor surrogate measures of the intraprostatic hormonal milieu.Impact: The high exposure misclassification provided by circulating sex steroid hormone concentrations for intraprostatic levels may partly explain the lack of any consistent association of circulating hormones with prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(11); 1660-6. ©2017 AACR.

Understanding patient and physician perceptions of male androgenetic alopecia treatments in Asia-Pacific and Latin America.

This survey aimed to explore patient and physician attitudes towards male androgenetic alopecia (AGA), satisfaction with currently available male AGA treatments and investigate the factors affecting treatment choice. The survey was carried out in five countries (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Mexico and Brazil) between November and December 2015 using a standard market research methodology. Questionnaires were completed by patients with male AGA or hair loss/thinning and practicing physicians who were responsible for prescribing AGA treatment. In total, 835 patients and 338 physicians completed the questionnaire. Overall, 37.6% of patients reported satisfaction with the treatments they had used. The highest patient satisfaction was reported for 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (53.9% of patients satisfied). In all countries, physicians were more likely than patients to think that male AGA has a major impact on patient confidence (89.3% vs 70.4%, respectively). There was agreement by physicians and patients that male AGA patients who are involved in their treatment decisions have better outcomes. Patients who were satisfied with AGA treatments were more likely to have the level of involvement they desired in treatment decisions (69.1% of satisfied patients) than dissatisfied patients (56.4% of dissatisfied patients). This survey provides valuable insights into the attitudes of patients and physicians in Asia and Latin America about male AGA and its treatments. The survey identified areas of disconnect between physicians and patients regarding the impact of male AGA, treatment consultations and the importance of treatment attributes. It also highlights the need for physicians to spend sufficient time with patients discussing AGA treatment approaches.

Bioequivalence Studies of a Reformulated Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Combination Capsule and a Commercially Available Formulation.

A dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg combination (DTC) capsule (Duodart® ) was reformulated to reduce the capsule size and enhance product stability. Bioequivalence of the reformulated DTC capsule with the commercial formulation was evaluated in 2 single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover studies in healthy adult male volunteers. Subjects in a fasted or fed state received a single oral dose of either the reformulated DTC or the commercial formulation followed by a 28-day washout period between treatments. Blood samples were taken predose and up to 72 hours postdose for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of dutasteride and tamsulosin serum concentrations. From the serum concentration-vs-time data, a noncompartmental method was used to calculate the maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC0-t ) for dutasteride and tamsulosin, and AUC0-∞ for tamsulosin. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the Cmax and AUC0-t (for dutasteride and tamsulosin) and for AUC0-∞ (for tamsulosin) were all completely contained within the range of 80% to 125%; therefore, the reformulated DTC capsule is bioequivalent to the commercial formulation under both fed and fasted states.

Can we use baseline characteristics to assess which men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia at risk of progression will benefit from treatment? A post hoc analysis of data from the 2-year CONDUCT study.

PURPOSE: To investigate (in a post hoc analysis of the 2-year CONDUCT study) the characteristics and clinical outcomes of men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) at risk of progression who benefitted from lifestyle changes alone. METHODS: Patients were given lifestyle advice and randomized to a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dutasteride and tamsulosin or watchful waiting (WW) and followed for 24 months. Patients in the WW group were escalated to tamsulosin if any follow-up International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was equal or greater than the baseline value. Improvements in symptoms (change in IPSS) and quality of life [measured by BPH Impact Index (BII) and question 8 of the IPSS (IPSS-Q8)] were analysed in the FDC group, men who initiated tamsulosin (WW-TAM) and men who received no medical intervention (WW-no treatment) and the impact of baseline variables on IPSS determined. RESULTS: The adjusted mean decrease in IPSS, BII and IPSS-Q8 at each post-baseline visit over 24 months appeared greater in the FDC (n = 369) and WW-no treatment groups (n = 144) than in the WW-TAM group (n = 229). IPSS improvements appeared similar in the FDC group and WW-no treatment subgroup, except in patients with the greatest degree of bother at baseline (BII 7-13). CONCLUSION: BII at baseline may be a more relevant indicator than symptom severity as to whether a patient with moderate symptoms should receive medical therapy or not.

Understanding patient and physician perceptions of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Asia Pacific, Latin America and the Commonwealth of Independent States: the Prostate Research on Behaviour and Education (PROBE) II survey.

AIM: To assess attitudes and beliefs towards benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)/ lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and its treatment among patients and physicians in Latin America, Asia Pacific and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). METHODS: Cross-sectional, quantitative study conducted between December 2014 and September 2015. Separate questionnaires were administered to BPH/LUTS patients receiving drug treatment for their condition and to practising physicians who treat patients with BPH/LUTS. RESULTS: In total, 1094 patients and 202 physicians completed a questionnaire. Most patients (61%) felt very/fairly well informed about BPH/LUTS, and 60% of physicians perceived patients to be very/somewhat informed. Overall, 70% of physicians felt that it would be valuable to raise awareness of BPH/LUTS and encourage men to consult a physician. The first symptoms most commonly noticed by patients were need to urinate more frequently, slower/weaker stream and nocturia. At first consultation, 71% of patients recalled providing a urine sample, 57% having a blood test for prostate-specific antigen and 56% a digital rectal examination being performed. Over two thirds of patients (69%) were satisfied with their current medication; highest satisfaction rates (among both patients and physicians) were reported for alpha blockers and 5ARIs, either as monotherapies or used in combination. Patients were prepared to wait longer for symptom relief in order to have a reduced risk of surgery. Most physicians (90%) thought that at least some patients believe BPH/LUTS to be a progressive condition. Most physicians thought that patients were very/fairly concerned about BPH surgery (92%) and acute urinary retention (72%); 52% of physicians thought treatment adherence was "extremely" important. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into the attitudes and beliefs of patients and physicians in Asia Pacific, Latin America and CIS about BPH/LUTS and its management. It also highlights areas of discordance between patient/physician perceptions and beliefs about BPH/LUTS, and potential areas of focus to improve the experience of affected patients.

Impact of Formulation on the Pharmacokinetics of Dutasteride: Results from Two Phase I Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dutasteride is currently marketed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), either as monotherapy or as a fixed-dose combination with tamsulosin. As part of the project to develop the fixed-dose combination product, alternative formulations of dutasteride were prepared by GSK, and their pharmacokinetic properties were investigated. METHODS: Two single-centre, open-label, active-comparator, randomised, three-period crossover studies were performed. The first study evaluated the relative bioavailability of dutasteride 0.5 mg soft gelatin capsule (marketed formulation, reference) versus a dutasteride 0.5 mg hard gelatin capsule and a dutasteride 0.5 mg tablet. The second assessed the relative bioavailability of dutasteride 0.5 mg from soft gelatin capsules containing 300 or 100 mg of mono- and diglycerides of caprylic acid/capric acid (MDC8, an emulsifying agent) versus the marketed formulation. RESULTS: In the first study (n = 36), compared with the marketed soft gelatin capsule formulation, the bioavailability (least squares [LS] means ratio) of the tablet formulation was 76 % (90 % CI 0.68-0.84), and that of the hard gelatin capsule was 73 % (90 % CI 0.66-0.82). Peak exposures were also lower for the tablet (73 %; 90 % CI 0.66-0.81) and hard capsule (71 %; 90 % CI 0.64-0.79) relative to the marketed soft gelatin capsule. In the second study (n = 37), compared with the marketed soft gelatin formulation, the bioavailability (LS means ratio) of the 300 mg MDC8 capsule formulation was 95 % (90 % CI 0.88-1.03), and that of the 100 mg MDC8 capsule formulation was 93 % (90 % CI 0.86-1.00). Peak exposures were also lower for the 300 mg MDC8 (90 %; 90 % CI 0.81-0.99) and 100 mg MDC8 (87 %; 90 % CI 0.79-0.96) formulations. CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of, and peak exposure to, dutasteride are influenced by the formulation of the administered medication. These studies demonstrate the importance of formulation for obtaining the optimal pharmacokinetic properties of dutasteride.

Long-term safety and efficacy of dutasteride in the treatment of male patients with androgenetic alopecia.

Androgenetic alopecia is an androgen-induced pattern of progressive hair loss, which occurs in genetically predisposed people. This study aimed to determine long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of dutasteride 0.5 mg, an inhibitor of 5-α-reductase, in Japanese male patients with androgenetic alopecia. This was a multicenter, open-label, prospective outpatient study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01831791, GSK identifier ARI114264) in which patients took dutasteride 0.5 mg p.o. once daily for 52 weeks. Primary end-points included adverse event assessment, incidence of drug-related adverse event and premature discontinuations. Secondary end-points included hair growth, hair restoration and global improvement in hair. A total of 120 patients were enrolled, of whom 110 completed 52 weeks of treatment. Nasopharyngitis, erectile dysfunction and decreased libido were the most frequently reported adverse events and most adverse events were mild. Drug-related adverse events were reported with an incidence of 17%, none of which led to study withdrawal. Hair growth (mean target area hair count at week 52), hair restoration (mean target area hair width at week 52) and global appearance of hair (mean of the median score at week 52) improved from baseline during the study. As a potential future treatment option for male androgenetic alopecia, dutasteride 0.5 mg exhibited long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy within this study population.